Why Physicians Are Losing Leverage (And What To Do Before It’s Too Late)

There’s a dynamic playing out in medicine right now that most physicians feel but few have named clearly.

The more years you put into your career, the less control you tend to have over it.

Your income is set by someone else. Your schedule is set by someone else. The terms under which you can leave, and where you can practice afterward, are set by a contract you signed years ago, possibly without fully understanding what you were agreeing to.

That’s not a burnout story. It’s a leverage problem. And the data suggests it’s getting worse.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Any investment involves risk, and you should consult your financial advisor, attorney, or CPA before making any investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The author and associated entities disclaim any liability for loss incurred as a result of the use of this material or its content.

The Shift That Happened Without a Vote

For most of the 20th century, physician ownership was the default. In the early 1980s, roughly 76% of physicians had an ownership stake in their practice.¹ That wasn’t a specialty move or an entrepreneurial detour. It was just how medicine worked.

Then the economics changed.

EHR mandates, rising overhead, declining reimbursements, and increasing regulatory complexity made running an independent practice harder every year. Medicare reimbursements lost nearly a third of their real value over 25 years.² The 2025 Physician Fee Schedule cut average payment rates by another 2.93%.³

Employment looked like the rational response. Let someone else handle the billing. Trade ownership for stability.

By 2012, 60.1% of physicians were still in private practice. By 2024, that number had dropped to 42.2%, an 18-percentage-point drop in just 12 years.⁴ And as of January 2026, data from the Physicians Advocacy Institute and Avalere Health shows that 82% of practicing physicians are now employed by hospitals or corporate entities.⁵

In roughly 40 years, the profession went from predominantly physician-owned to predominantly employed. Most physicians didn’t choose this direction so much as get swept into it, one contract at a time.

What Employment Actually Costs

The salary is real. So is the stability. But employment comes with three costs that don’t show up in the offer letter.

The first is clinical autonomy.

A survey of 1,000 employed U.S. physicians conducted by NORC at the University of Chicago and commissioned by the Physicians Advocacy Institute found that 61% reported having moderate or no autonomy to make referrals outside their practice or ownership system. Nearly half, 47%, reported policies or financial incentives to adjust patients’ treatment options to reduce costs. About 61% of employed physicians say they have moderate or no autonomy to make referrals outside their ownership system.⁷

The number that deserves more attention: 47% of employed physicians report adjusting patient treatment options based on their employer’s cost policies or incentives.⁷ That’s nearly half of employed physicians modifying clinical decisions based on administrative pressure. Most physicians trained with the expectation that clinical decisions would be theirs to make.

The second cost is satisfaction and wellbeing.

According to the Medscape Physician Burnout and Depression Report, 62% of physicians cite bureaucratic tasks as their primary driver of burnout, and 40% cite lack of respect from administrators and coworkers.⁸ The hours matter, but what erodes satisfaction fastest is the loss of professional agency, the feeling of expertise without authority.

Physicians in hospital-employed settings are nearly three times more likely to report job dissatisfaction than those in physician-owned practices, according to Bain and Company’s Frontline of Healthcare survey.⁹ Burnout rates in hospital-based specialties consistently perform below benchmark.

The third cost is financial, and it compounds over time.

Private practice physicians earn roughly 10% more on average than their employed counterparts. Over a 30-year career, that differential amounts to approximately $1 million in additional lifetime earnings (though the actual gap varies significantly by specialty, geography, and career path)¹⁰ .

But the income gap is actually the smaller problem.

The larger issue is equity. Every year an employed physician practices, they generate real value for their employer. Patient relationships, referral patterns, clinical reputation, volume. None of that value accrues to the physician. There is no ownership stake, no appreciation, no exit event. You are building the system’s asset on the system’s behalf.

The Non-Compete Problem

In 2024, the Federal Trade Commission attempted to ban non-compete agreements broadly. That rule was struck down in federal court. Non-competes remain fully enforceable in most states, and based on contracts being signed in 2026, the clauses are becoming more restrictive, not less.

For employed physicians, this creates a compounding trap. You spend years building a patient base in a community. You become known. Patients request you. And then, if you decide to leave, your contract may prohibit you from practicing within a specified radius, often 15 to 30 miles, for one to two years.

The leverage you built through years of practice is contractually non-transferable.

A Bain and Company survey found that 25% of physicians in health system-led organizations are considering changing employers, compared to 14% in physician-led practices.⁹ A significant portion of the employed physician workforce wants different terms. Most don’t have the financial position to act on that.

The Dependency Is the Problem, Not the Job

Employment is not inherently the issue. Plenty of employed physicians have built genuinely good careers and lives within that structure.

What creates the trap is single-source dependency. One employer, one income stream, a contract that limits exit options, and no financial alternatives developed along the way.

When the system changes, and it will, the physicians who have options are the ones who built them while still employed. The physicians who don’t have options are the ones who treated financial security as something the employer was responsible for providing.

The risk of employment wasn’t eliminated. It was concentrated.

Subscribe to receive the 7 Steps you can follow to achieve Financial Freedom

If financial freedom is your goal, there’s no better time to get started than right now.

Unlock actionable steps that you can take every day to fine-tune your goals, discover your interests, and avoid costly mistakes on your financial freedom journey.

GET YOURS NOW!

Two Things That Actually Change This

The first is building income outside your employer, specifically while you’re still employed and before you need it.

Real estate. Private investments. A side practice. Consulting. Content. The vehicle matters less than the principle: every dollar of income you build outside your employment relationship increases your leverage within that relationship. You negotiate differently. You tolerate less. You make requests you wouldn’t otherwise make, because your answer to “what if they say no?” has changed.

This isn’t about accumulating a second full-time income before you can act. It’s about shifting from financial dependency to financial optionality. Those are different thresholds, and the second one is more reachable than most employed physicians realize.

The second is understanding what the alternative practice models actually look like.

Direct primary care operates on a membership model, removing the insurance intermediary entirely. The physician controls panel size, schedule, and patient relationships. It now accounts for roughly 9% of the family medicine workforce and is growing steadily.¹¹

Concierge medicine and cash-pay practices similarly remove the third-party payer layer, giving physicians significantly more control over how care is delivered and compensated. Telemedicine creates a flexible income stream that can be layered onto an existing schedule without a full structural change.

Locum tenens, which has grown 25% since 2020,¹² is underused as a transition tool. It allows a physician to test a different structural arrangement without fully committing to a change. For physicians considering an exit but uncertain about timing or direction, it offers optionality without permanence.

None of these are right for every physician. But most employed physicians have never seriously evaluated them, because employment was presented as the obvious choice and no one offered a clear alternative.

The Real Question

The employed physician trap isn’t about bad employers or unfair contracts, though both exist. It’s about what happens when the only plan is the plan someone else made for you.

Medicine is changing quickly. Reimbursements are declining. Private equity is consolidating practices at scale. AI is beginning to change how care is documented and, eventually, how it’s delivered. Contracts are getting more restrictive.

None of that is within your control. What is within your control is whether you’ve built financial alternatives by the time any of it affects you personally.

The physicians who still have leverage when things shift are, almost without exception, the ones who started building it years before they needed it.

That’s not a coincidence. It’s a strategy.

If you want to go deeper on any of this, including practice models, passive income strategies, and how other physicians have navigated these decisions, join us at PIMDCON this September 24-26 in Dallas. Details at www.pimdcon.com.

Disclaimer: I am not a CPA, attorney, or financial advisor. The information in this post is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as tax, legal, or financial advice. Please consult a qualified professional about your specific situation before making any decisions.

Were these helpful in any way? Make sure to sign up for the newsletter and join the Passive Income Docs Facebook Group for more physician-tailored content.

Peter Kim, MD is the founder of Passive Income MD, the creator of Passive Real Estate Academy, and offers weekly education through his Monday podcast, the Passive Income MD Podcast. Join our community at the Passive Income Doc Facebook Group.